You see, I was always aware of what many people would have been thinking sniggeringly behind my back when I left Australian shores last month: "He'll be back. Sure he's thinks he's going to do a PhD and all, but let's face it to get that far the son of a bitch is going to have to enroll ...... Oh, chuckle, chuckle chuckle, tee hee hee, hee hee hee." Now, while I was at least a little tempted before now to post about my administrative peccadilloes on that front, well, I was always just that little bit frightened that you might actually be right and hence I thought I'd just hide quietly in a corner2 for a while. Anyways, I am now pleased to announce that I am now officially enrolled and, perhaps more importantly, am as of today able to actually log on to the fucking computer on my desk3. It is from said machine that I write this seminal post.
Having left Brisbane airport at 9:00 on a 3 hour flight which arrived in Wellington at 15:00 local time, I was feeling a little cheated. Assuming that I do so during another period of daylight saving, however, I suppose I will get to make that up on a subsequent return journey and take a 3 hour flight into a city 3 hours behind my point of departure - thus achieving the giddy thrill of feeling like I am arriving at the same time I departed. Anyway, perhaps because I was bitterly knawing away at this thought, I didn't just go straight to the university as it turns out I should have done - resolving instead to do so on the morrow. Let me explain why this turned out to be a terribly bad idea with a little aside, yes?
There is something, I think, rather endearing about the working habits of mathematicians. These being, to my eye, not dissimilar to that of composers or artists generally. In between sometimes feverish fits of work, they often find themselves just kind of tossing ideas about, taking long naps, coffee breaks, three hour lunches, wandering around and generally waiting for inspiration to hit them. Sometimes, for instance, they just need to up and go surfing on the south island for a couple of weeks or so. Funnily enough, this is precisely what my own principal supervisor found himself doing as of the day after I arrived - as I discovered upon checking my in-box on the 28th. There are a few more points which I feel are relevant to our discussion at this juncture:
- Australian students are here treated as domestic - and thus have to enroll in person.
- I discovered the above after sending all of my forms over in November 2006. Not to worry, though, the relevant documents (including required certified copies of academic transcripts, degrees and what-not the originals of which I was to subsequently leave in Australia) were, I was told, forwarded to my principal supervisor for safe-keeping, and all could thus be made well on my arrival.
- Even if I had all relevant copies (which I was cautious enough, in point of fact, to bring with me), and acquired minty fresh new forms to fill in on arrival - I still needed my supervisor's signature on one of them.
- The terms of my scholarship contract clearly required me to be enrolled by March 7 else there would be "no dineros for me".
- My supervisor was to return on March 11.
- My passport
- My Australian driver's license
- A proof of address5
- To pass the theory test you do to get a learner's permit.
Anyways, I am officially posting again, and shall write more anon.
1The little people
2 Some might say that this is an apt characterisation of what not just myself, but the entire population of New Zealand finds itself doing.......
3This is not to say that I wasn't happy with the various fulfilling pastimes I was able to enjoy with my nerd-machine. Why, I could make the keyboard go "click, click". I could rest hot beverages on it and play with the log-on screen for, oh, hours at a time. I just felt that it was time to take our relationship to the next level is all....
4This last was achieved in a quaint manner via a conversation with Rob (my administrative supervisor) which went a little something like this: Me: "Ah, could you possibly just write a letter on official letter-head addressed to me at this address?" Rob: "What should the letter say?" Me: *shrug* Rob: "Why don't I just write to confirm you're doing a PhD here?" Me: "No, I don't want it to sound like I asked you to do it....." Rob: "How about I just inform you you were allocated that office I showed you to yesterday, and that you should pick up at the school office that key you have in your pocket?" Me: "Perfect."
5Seriously, though, what the cock is with all of this address-proving crap you have to do here?
10 comments:
You have to show proof of address in France for everything to. Luckily for me, my lycée knew this and gave me an attestation de logement which I made half a dozen photocopies of, and all worked fine.
Post too long. Not enough pictures.
Call me.
PS - You are now bookmarked. I hope you are happy. In return I'd like you to tattoo "property of Adriana" on your forehead.
Too long?? Don't listen to Adriana. If anything, it needed more footnotes.
Why did you leave us? How long are you gone for? Why Wellington instead of Auckland? Do they have McDonald's in NZ?
I possibly, Dave, should have added another footnote about the learner's test which I studied for and took on the same day. They're much harder here than I remember it being in Oz, and contain a good deal more questions about fog, sheep (I'm not joking, there, actually) and matters of road-worthiness. They're multiple choice and you answer them like scratchies: you rub off the option you want to reveal a tick if you got it right and a cross if you got it wrong. I was unaware of this, however, and just thought the ticks were meant to represent the answer I'd gone for to the marker. This led for a far more stressful test experience than I would have liked: The pass mark being 32/35, I'd answered 34 of them and had (cursing my ill-preparedness) made educated guesses in, christ, about 10. I thought I was about to fail the frigging learner's test. The last question about which I had no damn clue at all was about legal loads in front of vehicles. I guess. I rub. I see a cross. A sweet, sweet cross. Never have I been so happy to know I got a question wrong before.
Adriana: such an act would contravene my moral stances on slavery. Also, I will consider creating a children's book version of my blog for you.....
Tinos: Mainly because I didn't want to do a PhD in statistics, mathematical physics or combinatorics. But I didn't leave you. I, like Yoda, will be with you ... always. Also, surprisingly enough, no there are no McDonalds in NZ. Also, I was annoyed to discover that they lack running water and oxygen for 3 hours of every day.
Ah, the old chicken and egg problem. I wonder, if you did a survey of government bureaucrats, how many would have read Catch-22? It should be required reading, if only to give them a deeper sense of irony about the way they fuck you.
PS, I also think your post could have used more footnotes.
PPS You hang up first. No you!
The thing I particularly like, Sam, is how you invariably only really need one type of identification really which can then be used to obtain others. The central assumption being that people engaged in identity fraud are just naturally lazier than everyone else.
Post a Comment