Wednesday, October 3, 2007

Gaussian Eliminators \ {Dave} undefeated.

O.K. So the following report is appearing to you, the reader before you see
the comments that appeared before the report. It's all very Star Wars episode
IV. So let's just pretend that report and comments make sense together and leave
it at that, shall we?

Hello. So this is me, Fitz, filling in for Dave as the official trivia correspondant answering to the need of you Joe Public, the little people, to have constant up-to-date information as to the trials and tribulations of a (sometimes) small and (sometimes) dedicated team of University of Queensland maths-department affiliates who see fit to play an awful lot of trivia. Well last night the team was neither small nor dedicated. We weren't even calling ourselves the Gaussian Eliminators exactly - but we won, god damn it, we won.

After inital suggestions that we name ourselves The Gaussian Eliminated Dave, we instead adopted the far less nasty, far more nerdy title you see above you. So why was this team so successful? Some said it was because we culled the Dave Barry dead weight (the author would, of course, like to acknowledge that this comment is grossly unfair - partly because Dave did, of course, tend to answer a lot of questions, but mostly because he'll be reading this post. Incidentally, if anyone knows how to insert footnotes on a blog post, I'd appreciate your letting me know. In the meantime, if the reader could imagine that the text within these brackets is in the more aesthetically appealing form of a footnote, the author would appreciate it. Thank you.). Some said it was down to our two new recruits. Some said it was because Nick saw fit to drag his arse from the minor human catastrophe that is the current state of his honours thesis and join our team. Well, actually, Nick said this at any rate, and we're all sure he had a point. Mostly, though, I'd like to put it down to our answering more questions correctly than any other team. Our final score was 32 1/2. Our nearest competitor scored 30. That's right team 30 points, if that is your real name: you were PWNED.

Our notable incorrect answers were as follows (correct answers to which, if not given here for comedic effect, can be found in subsequent commentry if anyone actually cares):
  1. What country's first government was headed by Henry Sewell in 1856? We put "South Africa". We was dufuses.
  2. What does W.A.P. stand for in the context of mobile phones? This one is notable, since we managed to get it wrong at the last Staff Club trivia also. We got a 1/2 mark, though.
  3. What percentage of the population of the Northern Territory identifies itself as indigenous? O.K. so Rupert gave everyone the clue that it was somewhere between 10% and 40%. We answered, incorrectly, 35%. This was notable because we should have listened to Geoff when he said that Rupert, bless his simple soul, would have selected those bounds such that the correct answer was precisely half way between them. He was right. The answer Rupert wanted was 25%. So, again, we was dufuses.
  4. Who was the first female director to gross 100 million at the box office? Now, this one shat me right off, because I was pretty damn sure (and wrote as much) that the correct answer was whoever the fuck directed the movie Big. This was right. Since I couldn't give this woman's name, we instead opted for the only female director we could think of: Sophia Coppola.
  5. What element comes last alphabetically? We wrote Zircon. This word has the benefit of requiring to be listed after Zinc in any dictionary in which the two words are listed. It does not, however, have the benefit of actually being an element. Zirconium was the answer Rupert was after. We got half a mark, which put us at 9 1/2 in a maths and physical sciences round when two other teams got 10. These kind of shennanigans make it very difficult to justify our team name.
Notable correct answers:
  1. From which city did the worlds longest car race begin in some year I can't remember? Stevo got the correct answer to this question. The Rally was called "Peking to Paris", from which an astute reader can infer the correct answer. Maybe getting this right only seems impressive to me, though, since I know almost nothing about sport.
  2. Who discovered Kangaroo Island? We got 1 1/2 points on this one for writing that the answer we thought he wanted was Matthew Flinders, but the answer we were nonetheless giving was "The aborigines". Readers take note: Rupert may not be giving out any more half marks for funny answers but you can still use the powerful weapon of guilt to get him to hand them over.
  3. How many faces does an icosahedron have? Notable because, in the maths and physical sciences round, I got this one right not because of any special knowledge of Platonic solids derived from years of formal mathematics training - but because I knew that the 20-sided die you use in Dungeons and Dragons was called an icosahedron.

16 comments:

David Barry said...

Good work. Your trivia reports are much less detailed than mine were, though.

David Barry said...

Unless, of course, you are vacuously undefeated. But given that it's Wednesday evening in Brisbane, I'll assume that that's not the case.

Andrew said...

I was going to add more, but decided against putting in the drunken post. Will add more later.

Andrew said...

The original post was an accident. I meant to save.

Unknown said...

I don't think that's strictly true, either. There was the time when Dave went to some conference or other for the week and we were without his input. I don't remember winning.

Andrew said...

O.K. So. Dave: happy now?

Anita: Your pedantry is not appreciated.

martin said...

WAP is wireless application protocol. We also got this question wrong at Harry's trivia.

I don't think I would have got the other ones though.

Andrew said...

I'm starting to think that we should all have "W.A.P. stands for Wireless Application Protocol" tatooed on the palms of our hand or something.

Andrew said...

Oh, and Dave: If you want to email me a current mailing address, I'm serious about that gold star.

David Barry said...

I would have guessed New Zealand, I knew WAP thanks to those previous incorrect answers, I knew zirconium.

Fitz: Given Martin's superlative answer to my odd-man-out question, you can instead send the gold star to him.

Nini said...

In light of the question whose answer was not Zircon, I would like to know what a periodic table question was doing in the Maths and Physics round.

I would also like to point out something which seemed to be lost on everybody last night: That while we were arguing about whether Zircon was an element or not, somebody said "No, you're thinking of Zirconium." Despite this being very true (I have no idea why I thought it was Zircon), nobody picked up on the fact that Zirconium is an element which would come after Zircon in an alphabetical list of words, regardless of whether Zircon was an element or not.

Obviously everyone was too engrossed in telling me I was wrong to actually pick up that the right answer had been stated. I'm not sure even the person who stated it was aware of the significance.

Andrew said...

Well, I guess that's two more we would have had if you were there, then Dave.

David Barry said...

Only if I didn't incorrectly over-rule you at other times.

By the way, I do footnotes in a hacky kind of way. I make a superscripted number like this [sup]1[/sup]. (Only I use greater than/less than signs.) Then I do the same at the bottom of the entry and type my footnote there.

Geoff said...

Never fear Dave, we reach consensus no better without you. The notable difference with Fitz as penmaster was the marked increase in silly answers in brackets aimed at getting partial credit. The irony is that Rupert gives half marks for clever or funny answers not pathetic mark grubbing ones (except when his own ego is involved). Don't take this personally Fitz, I thought you handled your pen with the skill and efficiency of a man who had been training all his life for this moment and had procured mock trivia sheets on which to practise. You also wrote much sexier than Dave.

Ben said...

I've noticed that this blog is missing something that every blog throughout the history of blogdom has at least one instance of..........AN ADVERTISMENT FOR VIAGRA...so here you go Andrew, welcome to the party: viva viagra

On the WAP question, I think that Wireless Access Point could be another answer due to the fact that the latest mobile phones can access the internet through a wifi network. A Wireless Access Point is a device that connects wireless communication devices together to form a wireless network.

Andrew said...

Dave: Cheers for the footnote. I don't think you would have over-ruled us at other times, we were pretty sure about the ones we got right. Unless maybe you would have argued strongly against answering "Martin Luther King" to the question "James Earl Ray was arrested at Heathrow Airport in 1968 for the assassination of whom?". I had a reasonably strong gut association with James Earl Ray and M.L.K. - but I thought M.L.K.'s assassin was arrested within a few days in the U.S. .

Ben: For the Viagra thing..... thanks(?). Wirless Access Point is, in fact, the answer we consistently incorrectly give. I demand satisfaction!

Geoff: I will treat your correspondence with the contempt it deserves.